Khushi Mukherjee's Bold Fashion: Clicking with Controversy in a Voyeuristic Society"

Video courtesy  National  Reporter

Khushi Mukherjee's Bold Fashion: Clicking with Controversy in a Voyeuristic Society"

Khushi Mukherjee’s bold fashion choices, which include [video], have indeed sparked significant attention , as evidenced by multiple news reports and social media discussions in June 2025. Outlets like Patrika, Hindustan Times, and ABP Live have covered her provocative outfits, noting public backlash and trolling for outfits deemed "obscene" or "vulgar" by some netizens, such as ripped jeans and revealing dresses. Posts on X further highlight this sentiment, with users criticizing her choices as "cheap publicity" or a violation of "Indian ethics," while others engage with the sensationalism.

Indeed, the voyeuristic tendencies of our society are at play here. Khushi’s viral content, such as her videos and photos, reportedly earns her significant engagement (e.g., 1.3 million Instagram followers and substantial income, as per TV9 Hindi). This reflects a market driven by curiosity and sensationalism, where bold imagery garners clicks and attention, even if it invites moral outrage. Her comparison to Urfi Javed, another figure known for unconventional fashion, underscores this dynamic.

On the legal front, India’s obscenity laws are indeed opaque and inconsistently applied. Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines obscenity vaguely, criminalizing material deemed "lascivious" or appealing to "prurient interest," but lacks clear standards. The Information Technology Act, 2000, also regulates online content, but its application to fashion or social media posts remains subjective, often hinging on public complaints or cultural sensitivities. The Supreme Court has cautioned against misuse of stringent laws for harassment, which could apply to vague obscenity charges, but no specific legal action against Khushi has been reported in the provided sources.

It's clear that the outrage over Khushi’s outfits often ignores personal freedom in favor of cultural policing, yet the same society consumes her content voraciously, exposing a hypocrisy. Without clearer legal definitions or consistent enforcement, such controversies will likely persist as both a cultural and market phenomenon. This underscores the urgent need for clearer legal standards.