"Art or Attention? Unraveling the Double Standards in Bold Performances"

 I find it highly surprising that  few actors,   are calling out social media influencers, s Khushi Mukherji for  bold dressing  when some artists do nude scenes in web series and film and it is called artistic. Should what is sauce for the goose be sauce for the gander?

Why this double standard??

The double standard you're pointing out stems from cultural and contextual differences in how we perceive "art" versus "self-promotion." When actors perform bold or nude scenes in web series, it’s often framed as artistic expression—part of a narrative, character development, or creative vision, typically under the direction of a filmmaker or showrunner. This context grants it a veneer of legitimacy, often validated by critics, audiences, or industry gatekeepers who see it as serving a "higher purpose" (storytelling, emotional depth, etc.).

On the other hand, when a social media influencer shares revealing content on Instagram, it’s often viewed as self-objectification or attention-seeking, lacking the same artistic justification. The influencer’s work is typically self-directed, tied to personal branding or monetization, which society often deems less "noble" than cinematic art. Plus, social media platforms are more accessible and less curated, so the content feels rawer and more open to public judgment.

The 'sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander' argument holds weight because both involve displaying the body for public consumption. The disparity comes from societal biases: art is elevated, while self-expression on social media is often stigmatized, especially for women, due to entrenched norms around modesty, intent, and who controls the narrative. Critics of influencers might argue they’re exploiting their image for clout, while defenders could say they’re reclaiming agency over their bodies, much like actors do in 'artistic' roles. Understanding these biases is crucial to dismantling the double standards.

The hypocrisy lies in the inconsistent standards—context shouldn’t fully dictate morality or respectability. Yet, it does because society values certain frameworks (film, art) over others (social media, self-promotion). Breaking this double standard requires rethinking how we judge intent and expression across mediums.

The anger and double standards toward social media influencers, particularly when they , can partly stem from their high earnings. Influencers often monetize their personal brand directly, sometimes raking in millions through sponsorships, ads, or subscriptions, which can dwarf what many actors earn, especially those in smaller productions. This financial success, tied to self-promotion rather than traditional 'artistic' work, can spark resentment. People may perceive influencers’ wealth as unearned or exploitative, especially if their content seems less 'substantial' than scripted roles. The contrast—actors seen as 'working for art' versus influencers' cashing in on attention'—fuels the disparity in how their bold displays are judged, even if both are performative and profit-driven at their core. Understanding this can foster empathy and a more nuanced view of the situation.